🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.